|
|
 |
|
Product:
|
Thermaltake Silent Boost HSF Cooler |
|
Price:
|
$37 (CAN) / $28 (U.S)
|
|
Supplied By:
|
Xoxide
|
|
Author:
|
Hi-TEK
|
|
Date:
|
October 10th, 2003
|
|
Rating:
|
|
|
Click image for larger view
|
Click image for larger view
|
|
One of the biggest critiques that I have for most coolers on the market is the design of the clipping
mechanism. A well designed or poorly executed clipping mechanism can essentially make or break a heatsink
cooler design. The clipping mechanism on the Thermaltake Silent Boost HSF consists of a 3-lug style design,
which covers all three clips on a CPU socket. There is a small opening which allows you to insert a
flathead screwdriver and slowly install the heatsink in place without worrying about damaging a
motherboard.
Testing:
In order to provide accurate test results, I choose to not use the included thermal compound that was
supplied in the package. I will be using Artic Silver 3 in this round of testing for the Thermaltake
Silent Boost HSF. A small portion of the compound was spread against the copper base using a plastic
thin squeegee. For comparison I tested the Thermaltake Silent Boost HSF against Spire's 5F271B1L3
FalconRock II CPU Cooler. The test system consists of the following components:
- Asus AV7333 Motherboard
- AMD Athlon XP 1800+ CPU
- 512 MB Kingmax Tiny BGA DDR 333 RAM
- MSI G4 MX440 8X video card
- Maxtor D740X-GL 60 GB Hard drive
- D-Link DFE-530TX NIC card
- LG GCC-4120B Combination IDE Drive (12x8x32 CDRW + 8x DVD)
The "Burn-In Wizard" from SiSoft Sandra 2003 is used to put the CPU under concentrated load for a
pre-determined amount of time. The options selected in "Burn-In Wizard" run the CPU and CPU Multimedia
benchmarks for approximately 15 minutes. The system is left alone for approximate 15 minutes before the
burn-in test is performed. Maximum temperatures are measured in degree Celcius and recorded for idle,
full load, idle overclock and full load overclock using an independant thermal probe and Motherboard
Monitor 5.3.4.0. The system was run in normal mode at 1.5 GHz and in overclocked mode (VCORE 1.8, FSB 142, Multiplier 11.5x)
in order to get the system running at 1.6 GHz.
|
|
Click image for larger view
|
Click image for larger view
|
|
The Thermaltake Silent Boost HSF was able to beat the Spire 5F271B1L3 FalconRock II CPU Cooler in a series
of burn-in tests but only by a marginal 2-3 degree difference. Higher marginal temperature differences
between both units for overclock idle and overclock full load results were 1-2 degrees respectively.
What is a sure indication for both units is that there is a trade off in terms of cooling performance
for silent operation. The Spire 5F271B1L3 FalconRock II CPU Cooler like the Thermaltake Silent Boost HSF
uses a standard 80mm ball bearing fan which is very quiet at 2300 RPM +/-10% and is capable of pushing 27.99 CFM
at a noise level of 25.0 dBA. While both units are very quiet, the Silent Boost wins hands down in
terms of silent operation thanks to the "Hydro Wave Bearing" fan and low 21 dBA noise level.
|
|
Conclusion:
The Thermaltake Silent Boost HSF works as advertised and does provide near silent operation with average
cooling results. The design of the all copper heatsink base and aluminum fan shroud support the installation
of a 60mm or 80mm fan with ease. Consumers will appreciate the 3-lug style design of the clipping mechanism,
which provides some assurances of a secure fit once installed on top of a CPU socket. The silent cooling
performance is a definitely plus for those individuals concerned with fan noise levels but at the same
time restricts the Silent Boost HSF for specific applications and environments. Test results indicate
that there is clearly a trade-off in performance for silent operation. As an option, the "Hydro Wave Bearing"
fan can be easily replaced with a high performance 80mm fan from Sunon, Vantec or Delta for slightly
better results. Overall, I’m rating Thermaltake Silent Boost HSF an 8 out of 10,
and would only recommend this cooler to cosumers looking for an all cooper cooling solution for quite
working environments. If you have any questions regarding this review be sure to visit the
Xoxide website for more information
or discuss them in our forums.
|
Pros:
- Small footprint
- Quiet operation
- AMD Recommended
- Moderate performance
|
Cons:
- Generic thermal paste included
- Not suited for overclocking environments
|
|
|
|
|
|